Connect with us

Artificial Intelligence

Inside DeepMind’s bioresilience push: 15 partnerships, DNA screening gaps, and a dual-use dilemma

Published

on

AI bioresilience

A quiet initiative goes public

Google DeepMind and Isomorphic Labs have pulled back the curtain on a bioresilience program that has been quietly building steam for the past year. The two sister organizations now count more than 15 partnerships with government bodies, biosecurity groups, and academic research teams — all aimed at keeping advanced AI from being weaponized in biology while accelerating outbreak detection and response.

The disclosure comes with a specific tension baked in. Frontier models like Gemini already carry a deep, increasingly detailed understanding of biology. Pair that with specialized biology models, agent platforms like Antigravity, and third-party databases, and the capability only sharpens. The same knowledge that helps a researcher map a vaccine target could, in principle, help a threat actor close gaps in their own understanding. DeepMind and Isomorphic frame this as a dual mandate: push scientific progress while keeping dangerous tools out of the wrong hands.

Three pillars, 15 partners, and a lot of unknowns

The program rests on three pillars: preventing misuse, detecting outbreaks faster, and responding once an outbreak or attack is underway. Over the last year, DeepMind has built partnerships touching all three, though the company has named only a handful of collaborators so far — including Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, the UK AI Security Institute, CEPI, and the Francis Crick Institute.

Over the next six to twelve months, DeepMind says it plans to widen those relationships, with a focus on threat intelligence, evaluation methods for AI agents, and jailbreak mitigations. It’s also coordinating with the Frontier Model Forum on thornier questions — like how to handle riskier categories of training data, with virology datasets cited as the example.

Locking down Gemini without blocking legitimate science

Prevention work starts with threat modeling. DeepMind says it’s trying to identify which actors are most likely to attempt misuse and what bottlenecks currently stop them. The company uses a mix of expert red-teaming and randomized controlled trials to judge whether Gemini could help someone clear those bottlenecks.

Post-training methods are designed to teach the model to refuse harmful queries while avoiding what DeepMind calls over-refusal of legitimate science questions. It’s a balance that’s proven difficult across the industry, not just for DeepMind. Classifiers and probes flag risky activity in real time, and targeted log analysis catches subtler misuse patterns that automated filters might miss.

None of these mitigations is described as solved. DeepMind frames them as an ongoing process rather than a finished system — a distinction that matters for any enterprise or government body evaluating whether to rely on the safeguards as currently configured. A classifier tuned against known jailbreak patterns in a controlled evaluation doesn’t guarantee equivalent performance against novel attack methods surfacing in live use. The company doesn’t claim otherwise.

The DNA synthesis screening problem

One of the more concrete risks involves DNA synthesis. Companies within the International Gene Synthesis Consortium currently screen orders against lists of known harmful pathogens and toxins, paired with screening algorithms. DeepMind states plainly that this approach is starting to fray. AI can now help design DNA sequences with similar function to a dangerous pathogen without matching its sequence closely enough to trigger existing screens.

The proposed fix borrows from DeepMind’s existing watermarking system, SynthID, which the company says has become an industry standard for marking AI-generated images and text. Adapting it to biological sequences is presented as exploratory work, not a shipped product.

A longer-term goal — described as an open technical challenge rather than something close to resolved — involves screening that predicts whether a novel DNA sequence is likely toxic or pathogenic based on its function, regardless of whether it resembles anything in existing databases.

Cheaper sequencing as the detection layer

Detection depends on metagenomic sequencing, which characterizes every microorganism in a sample rather than checking for a shortlist of known pathogens the way traditional diagnostics do. The limiting factor is cost. Scaling the approach to the regions where outbreaks are most likely to originate requires that cost to fall considerably.

DeepMind points to a collaboration between Google and Pacific Biosciences that used its AlphaEvolve coding agent to improve sequencing accuracy as one data point toward that goal. The company says it’s now looking at further opportunities — from optimizing the algorithms that process sequencing data, through to informing hardware design — and separately exploring whether AlphaGenome could help characterize pathogens directly from sequence data.

These remain research collaborations rather than field-deployed systems. The distance between a sequencing accuracy gain in a controlled pipeline and a functioning early-warning network across wastewater and transit hubs in low-resource settings is not small.

AlphaFold’s publication record and the countermeasure gap

The response pillar leans on the medical countermeasure gap that leaves many known pathogens without a licensed diagnostic, vaccine, or treatment. DeepMind cites more than 10,000 publications on infectious disease that have referenced AlphaFold over five years, covering work on tuberculosis and malaria transmission and target mapping for threats including Mpox and Nipah.

The newest addition to that record is a partnership with Lawrence Livermore’s bioresilience program, which plans to use AlphaFold 3 for broad-spectrum antibody design work, including a pan-filovirus antibody effort. DeepMind says it will keep adding protein structures and complexes to the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database this year, prioritizing targets relevant to countermeasure development.

Access to newer agent systems, including Co-Scientist, is being extended to selected researchers — among them scientists in the US Department of Energy’s National Laboratories working under the Genesis Mission.

Isomorphic Labs has gone a step further, setting up a dedicated unit intended to deploy its drug design engine quickly during a novel outbreak, working alongside government and national research bodies such as Lawrence Livermore, the UK AI Security Institute, CEPI, and the Francis Crick Institute. The company also pledged $7 million to Health for Human Potential, a Philanthropy Asia Alliance programme, for infectious disease research across Asia.

Policy wishlist meets legislative reality

DeepMind’s recommendations to US policymakers map directly onto its three pillars and lean on specific pending legislation:

  • Prevention: It backs a federal frontier AI safety framework, the AI-Ready Bio-Data Standards Act (H.R. 7907), mandatory DNA synthesis screening through the Biosecurity Modernization and Innovation Act (S. 3741), and the SCALE Biology Act (H.R. 8981).
  • Detection: It wants metagenomic sequencing expanded across transit hubs and dense population centres, supported by the America’s Living Library Act (S. 4023) and additional DARPA and HHS funding for early-warning research.
  • Response: It calls for the Web of Biological Data Act (H.R. 9307 / S. 4770) and investment in manufacturing capacity kept “warm-based” and ready for rapid activation, alongside pre-established clinical trial networks and faster regulatory pathways.

None of that legislation is enacted. The gap between a company’s policy wishlist and a functioning federal biosecurity framework is where the real test of this program will play out over the next 6-12 months.

For more on how AI is reshaping health diagnostics, see our coverage of Neko Health’s $700 million raise for AI body scans. And for a deeper look at the broader landscape, check out AI & Big Data Expo taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Artificial Intelligence

Reelful’s AI agent edits your camera roll into ready-to-post social videos

Published

on

Reelful AI video editor

You have the footage. Reelful does the editing.

A new iOS app called Reelful promises to take the pain out of video editing. Instead of spending hours cutting clips, adding transitions, and recording voiceovers, you just hand over your camera roll and a short prompt. The app’s AI handles the rest — scripting, assembling, voice cloning, even animating still photos. The result is a polished short-form video ready for TikTok, Instagram Reels, or YouTube Shorts.

Reelful is built for people who want to post consistently but don’t have the time or patience for traditional editing tools. It joins a growing wave of AI startups — including Opus Clip and Captions — that are automating content creation. The app is currently part of a16z’s Speedrun accelerator program.

Who built Reelful and why?

Reelful was founded by Kate Deyneka, a former machine learning engineer at Snapchat who worked on video and image models. She left the social media giant to build what she calls an “agentic video editor” — one that removes the need to manually select clips, add effects, or fine-tune edits.

“I want to post more on Instagram, TikTok, YouTube Shorts, but video editing takes a lot of time,” Deyneka told TechCrunch. “I have a lot of events, I meet a lot of interesting people. I see Reelful as a tool that can help people build their online presence and their personal brand.”

Her target audience right now is founders and business owners. People who attend events, meet clients, and collect raw footage — but never get around to turning it into content. A salon in the Bay Area might have before-and-after shots of clients, Deyneka says, but no one on staff to edit them into a Reel. That’s where Reelful steps in.

How Reelful works: prompt, voice clone, upload, done

The process is straightforward. You enter a prompt describing the story you want to tell — a travel recap, product demo, or event highlight. Then you record a 30-second voice sample to create an AI voice clone. After that, you select the photos and video clips from your camera roll.

Reelful takes over from there. It plans the video structure, writes a script, generates an AI voiceover in your cloned voice, and assembles the final edit with captions, music, and sound effects. The app can even turn still images into short AI-generated video clips. For example, if you include a photo of someone cutting a mango, Reelful can animate the image to show the knife slicing into the fruit.

All AI-generated videos are watermarked to indicate they were created with artificial intelligence.

Chat-based fine-tuning after the first edit

Once Reelful produces a draft video, you can keep refining it by chatting with the app. Swap the soundtrack. Revise the script. Adjust the pacing. The interface is conversational, not a timeline of tracks and layers.

“My target use case is that you went to an event or you met some cool people, and you recorded a short interview with them,” Deyneka says. “While you are driving back home you just uploaded everything to the app, and by the time you’re home, the video is ready.”

Pricing and availability

Reelful offers both one-time credit packs and monthly subscriptions. Here’s the breakdown:

  • Credit packs (one-time): 5 videos for $15, 15 videos for $43, or 33 videos for $90
  • Creator subscription: $25 per month for 10 videos
  • Pro subscription: $50 per month for 25 videos
  • Studio subscription: $100 per month for 60 videos

The app is currently iOS-only. Deyneka plans to launch Android and web versions in the future.

What this means for content creators

Reelful isn’t the first AI video editor, but it’s one of the most focused on AI short-form video creation for busy professionals. The pitch is simple: you already have the footage on your phone. You just need someone — or something — to edit it. If the app delivers on its promise, it could save founders, freelancers, and small business owners hours of work per week.

The bigger question is whether AI-generated video, even with a voice clone and animated stills, feels authentic enough for personal branding. Deyneka seems confident. “I want to make it very effortless for people to share their life, their content, their expertise without actively editing,” she says. For many, that trade-off will be worth it.

Continue Reading

Artificial Intelligence

How Claude helped my 65-year-old dad finally ditch his handwritten ledgers

Published

on

Claude AI handwritten ledgers

My dad’s old-school bookkeeping habit

For as long as I can remember, my father has run a small business. And for just as long, he has kept his books the old-fashioned way: every sale gets written down by hand. It works well enough for tracking daily revenue, but when tax season rolls around, his accountant needs that data in Microsoft Excel. My dad, who never grew up around computers, has never learned how to use a spreadsheet.

For years, his solution was paying someone to manually type each handwritten entry into a digital file. It got the job done, but it added a recurring cost he wanted to eliminate. He just couldn’t figure out how.

The moment that sparked the idea

Last week, I visited home and found my dad hunched over his notebook, writing out yet another day’s worth of sales. I tried teaching him a few Excel basics. To his credit, he picked them up quickly. But the data entry itself was still eating up hours — typing rows and rows of numbers isn’t something you master overnight, especially if you didn’t grow up with computers.

That’s when it clicked: why not use Anthropic’s Claude AI to take the manual work off his plate entirely?

Turning handwritten bills into a spreadsheet with Claude

I got to work. I set up a simple Claude project and gave it instructions: take photos of my dad’s handwritten bills and turn them into properly filled-out Excel data. To show the AI exactly what I wanted, I built a sample spreadsheet and filled in the first few rows manually. I then uploaded that sample sheet along with photos of his handwritten records.

Claude filled in the rest. Data that would have taken my dad hours to type by hand took only minutes. Yes, the AI made occasional mistakes — a misread number here, a skipped line there. But all my dad had to do was cross-check the output. That is far easier than entering hundreds of rows from scratch.

The best part? Claude projects remember the setup. Now all my dad has to do is open the project, create a new chat, upload his spreadsheet and handwritten bills, and Claude handles the data entry from there. No formulas to memorize. No formatting to figure out. No one else to pay.

Is the AI tradeoff worth it?

I’m not someone who thinks AI is an unquestionable good. The natural resources that data centers burn through, and the price increases we’re seeing across consumer electronics, are hard to ignore. I don’t always believe the benefits match what we’re giving up.

But then I look at my dad. He’s 65, has never been comfortable with computers, and always assumed tools like Excel were simply not for him. Now, with a setup that took me an afternoon to build, he’s using AI to run a part of his business that used to cost him time and money every week.

I don’t think this cancels out the bigger concerns around AI. But it’s hard to dismiss what it has done for one person who never thought this kind of technology was within his reach. The joy I saw on his face when he completed his first Excel sheet is something I will always hold in my heart. For that one moment, at least, the tradeoffs felt worth it.

Continue Reading

Artificial Intelligence

The AI compute gap: Enterprises are buying infrastructure faster than they can measure what it costs

Published

on

AI compute gap

Enterprises are spending big on AI infrastructure — but they can barely see where the money goes

New research from VentureBeat paints a stark picture: the vast majority of enterprises are pouring money into AI compute while flying nearly blind on cost. The report, drawn from a Q2 2026 survey of 107 organizations with over 100 employees, identifies what it calls an AI compute gap — the widening distance between how aggressively companies invest in AI hardware and how poorly they track its economics.

Only 21% of respondents run AI in production at scale. Yet spending intentions are already racing ahead of that maturity. The single largest area enterprises plan to evaluate over the next year is AI-specialized clouds (45%) — a category almost none of them use today. Meanwhile, the compute they already own sits mostly idle: 83% report GPU utilization of 50% or less. Fewer than half (44%) rigorously track what their AI compute actually costs.

“Enterprises are buying more infrastructure faster than they can account for what they already own,” the report states. That gap is the central tension of the moment.

GPU utilization is abysmal — and largely unmeasured

Perhaps the most striking number in the study: 83% of enterprises that operate GPUs report utilization at or below 50%. Nearly half (49%) run at 25% or below. Only 12% clear the 50% mark. Another 8% don’t measure utilization at all.

Idle accelerators are expensive accelerators. A single Nvidia H100 can cost tens of thousands of dollars. Let whole clusters sit half-empty, and the waste compounds fast. The report calls this the clearest single measure of the compute gap: enterprises plan to buy more GPUs and specialized compute while the capacity they already own sits substantially unused.

The measurement problem runs deeper than utilization. Fewer than half of enterprises (44%) rigorously track the cost and return of their AI compute. Another 39% track only partially. Twenty percent cannot quantify it yet, and 6% have not prioritized it at all.

That’s a problem because total cost of ownership (TCO) is the second-most important factor when enterprises choose an AI infrastructure provider — cited by 35% of respondents. Integration with the existing stack ranks first (41%). Headline price? Cost per million tokens matters to just 8%, dead last. “Enterprises are choosing providers on an economic basis they mostly cannot yet measure,” the report notes.

A switching wave is building — most within the year

Enterprises are not loyal to their current infrastructure vendors. A clear majority (64%) plan to switch or add an infrastructure provider within twelve months. Even more striking: 38% intend to do so within the next quarter. That is unusually high churn intent for a category as foundational as compute.

Where does that interest point? Mostly at the incumbents. Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud each draw 33% switching consideration, followed by OpenAI (30%) and Gemini (22%). The report suggests much of the near-term movement is reshuffling among the majors and consolidating spend — not defecting to new entrants. The neocloud interest is a 12-month evaluation thesis; the switching in the next quarter is mostly incumbents trading share.

The next dollar goes to infrastructure they don’t yet run

Here is the report’s sharpest tension. The single most-cited planned evaluation area — AI-specialized clouds, at 45% — is the very category almost none of these enterprises use today. The specialized “neocloud” GPU providers that dominate AI-infrastructure headlines — CoreWeave, Lambda, Crusoe, Nebius and peers — register at or near zero among these enterprises today.

Nearly a third (32%) intend to evaluate non-Nvidia accelerators. Twenty-eight percent plan to look at next-generation Nvidia silicon. Even decentralized compute networks (16%) and sovereign compute (11%) draw meaningful interest. Read against current usage, this is not incremental — it is the leading edge of a re-platforming.

The direction-of-travel question tells the same story: every infrastructure approach is net-expanding, but specialized AI clouds carry the highest net momentum (+24), edging out even the hyperscalers (+22). Enterprises are preparing to move a meaningful share of AI compute off the general-purpose cloud.

The next bottleneck: memory, not compute

The report also flags a frontier constraint that is barely on most enterprises’ radar. As large-scale inference scales, the binding constraint shifts from GPU compute to memory bandwidth — specifically KV-cache capacity. Asked how they would address this shift, enterprises scatter: Dell leads at 31%, Nvidia follows at 16%, and the rest fragments across storage vendors, open-source tooling, and model-level efficiency techniques.

Most telling: roughly one in five (18%) either do not recognize the constraint or have not begun to address it. “For a shift that will reshape inference cost and architecture, this is an early and unsettled market,” the report notes. It is the next chapter of the compute gap, arriving before most have closed the current one.

What this means for enterprise AI strategy

The report’s bottom line is blunt: the compute gap is not a capacity problem that more hardware will solve on its own. It is, first, a problem of seeing what the hardware already costs.

For enterprises, the implications are concrete. Before committing to specialized clouds or alternative accelerators, organizations should invest in instrumentation — utilization monitoring, cost allocation, TCO modeling. Without that visibility, the next round of spending risks repeating the same inefficiencies at a larger scale.

Satisfaction with current infrastructure is moderately positive (4.0 on a five-point scale) but softest on value for money — the dimension hardest to judge without measurement. That softness is a signal. Enterprises that build cost visibility now will be better positioned to evaluate the specialized clouds and alternative accelerators they plan to assess. Those that don’t will be buying the next layer of infrastructure as blind to its economics as the last.

The open question for later waves is whether enterprises build that visibility before the re-platforming arrives — or after.

Continue Reading

Trending